Reflections on The Melbourne Fringe Festival and Independent Art

The Melbourne Fringe Festival is a rambling affair, with ‘open-entry’ to all ‘creative types’, largely non-discerning in the projects it includes and encompassing a vast array of the expressive forms we call ‘the arts’.  The venues are as varied and unpredictable as the shows, they may be in one of the ‘festival hubs’ such as The Lithuanian Club or The North Melbourne Town Hall, in a ‘home theatre’ set up in a kitchen, or a ‘traveling performance’, taking you by surprise as you commute via tram. The festival is also a time to ponder the implications of an ever-broadening ‘art scene’ in Melbourne for the plight of independent expression.

The Festival has aligned itself with frequently used Melbourne cultural catch phrases such as “edgy”, “innovative” “independent”, “emerging” art. We are – and we are constantly reminded of this – a city that “loves our art”. The sections branded as ‘arts and culture’ in our mainstream newspapers remain prominent, testament to the revenue created by these industries, even if the ‘big earners’, the blockbuster musicals such as Wicked are more closely tied to their corporate counterparts than any artistic community and are anything but “edgy” or “innovative”. However, since ‘art’ is not something that traditionally originates amongst corporate ventures, something that used to speak of the struggle to understand and make sense of society by artists who were often disenfranchised by the mainstream, it is important that Melbourne be seen as accommodating its “emergent”, “edgy” “deviant” artists.  Also, as free consumers, it is only right that we be allowed to indulge our individual tastes, be they ‘Mumma Mia, The Musical’ or “independent”, “small scale” art.

Events like The Fringe Festival, apart from creating the semblance of democratically facilitating diversity within the arts, obviously serve as a great opportunity for various PR ventures, such as Metlink, (formerly Connex) who have jumped on the Fringe wagon this year. PR on their website employs artistic jargon to boast of Metlinks “parternership” with the Fringe.

“Metlink CEO Bernie Carolan said that the partnership with Fringe was an opportunity to promote the benefits of catching public transport to Melbourne’s major events.”…. “By teaming up with the Melbourne Fringe Festival we turned the public transport network into the stage for part of this unique performance”. ~ Metlink website

This tedious piece of culture-devouring PR is typical of what has become the ‘Melbourne’ advertising montage, a jumble of projects that feed off the ‘city’s’ profile as a cultural hub, see the government sponsored “that’s Melbourne city” website.  Interestingly, the performance Metlink champions, “by Japanese artist, Yasuko Kurono” features the symbolic imagery of “clones”.

image from Metlink website

image from Metlink website

Have our independents become cloned images of their former selves, sponsored by the very private systems that thrive off an ideology essentially hostile to independence and expression in its true sense? (See article tagged under ‘space’ on this blog)  When private companies parade the fruits of their cultural co-ventures we must question the very meaning of ‘independent’ again.

What does the homogenization of established and ‘emerging’ art under the same Melbourne ‘cultural’ banner mean for the lauded notion of an ‘independent artist’, or an independent anything for that matter?  Whilst corporate sponsorship of the arts increases, corporate annexing of our education system erodes the departments in which the arts are fostered.  A case in point is the moves to transform Melbourne’s VCA (Victorian College of The Arts), amalgamating its programs into a larger Melbourne University model, dictated by corporate interests.

When you go along to a Fringe show, you cannot help but be moved by the time and energy obviously invested in the work, often individually, lovingly curated; small scale but impressively accomplished. Many of the artists have been preparing their Fringe pieces for the past year, and hope to make themselves known to audiences, bettering their positions for their own ‘independent’ practice. Many of the Fringe artists I have spoken to cannot afford to purchase tickets on Melbourne Private transport.

Links to explore:

Melbourne Fringe Festival Home

Background and Coverage of VCA proposed curriculum changes

Geoffrey Rush joins VCA protest – ABC

Ex-ministers protest against VCA merger – ABC

Wikipedia background on Melbourne Model

VCA uprising engulfs Gly Davis – Business Spectator

Leave a comment

Filed under Art, Festivals

what’s this

“Wherever representation becomes independent, the spectacle regenerates itself”
~ Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle

Whilst exploring the fruits of the Melbourne Fringe festival’s digital fringe, an online open –entry uncurated archive of short digital media works, one may stumble upon one of Addictive TV’s latest masterpieces.

‘Addictive TV’ are known for their re-working of popular blockbuster films and advertisements into digitally re-mixed music clips, stylistically un-categorized, distributed and marketed ‘virally’.

Slumdog Millionaire Vs. Addictive TV

What to make of this one that mixes up image and sound from the 2008 film Slumdog Millionaire into what noiseporn.com help us to identify as “a tribal-breaks-scratch-athon which is… fucking cool”.  The schizophrenic re-visioning of a film in the name of advertising is yet another art form we are assured, but evidently this is one that relies heavily on pre-esxisting content.  In this case the content is the film itself, an oscar collecting blockbuster accused of peddling “tourist porn” and painting a damagingly misleading picture of Indian society.  If you agree with these accusations then the work of Addictive TV is merely reaping the benefits of the same vulgar appeal that the film thrived on.

In another ambiguous ‘pop-up’, Cillit Bang (see below), representation attempts to depart  from advertising with  the aid of some of the “new creative” (see thereel.net), who seem to have wholeheartedly embraced their  roles as facilitators of the merging of culture, art and consumerism.  If we aphoristically embrace each new cycle of representation as autonomous without questioning its origin, we may be at the mercy of forms of entertainment less innocent than they make out.

So, do you buy it?

Leave a comment

Filed under Festivals, film

Life and Debt

a feature length documentary by Stephanie Black (2001)

Have you ever been a tourist?

Have you ever gone in search of sun to one of those places we label ‘exotic’ and ‘tropical’.  Maybe you wanted to ‘experience another culture’, ‘live on the edge’, ‘relax’, have an ‘adventure.’

You may feel you got your moneys worth if you are the type that is satisfied with pre-packaged holidays in resorts with all your days planned.  But chances are, you will have been left wondering why the ‘natives’ weren’t like the smiling ones in the advertisements?  Why was there so much poverty?  Why were you constantly hassled by hawkers selling fake watches?

“Every native of every place is a potential tourist and every tourist is a native of somewhere.  Every native would like to find a way out, every native would like a rest, every native would like a tour.  But some natives, most natives in the world cannot go anywhere.  They are too poor to escape the realities of their lives and they are too poor to live properly in the places where they live, which is the very place you, the tourist want to go.  So when the natives see you, the tourist, they envy you.  They envy your ability to leave your own banality and boredom, they envy your ability to turn their own banality and boredom into a source of pleasure for yourself.” ~ from A small Place by Jamaica Kincaid

Poverty in many countries is no secret.  What is something of an institutionalised secret is a major cause for the tragic situations of many ‘popular tourist destinations’.  We are led to believe that poverty is a complex problem with many contributing factors and is being addressed by sympathetic overseas aid agencies, NGO’S and governments alike with acronyms that we do not question much like IMF and UN.

Focussing on Jamaica but speaking about an urgent issue of ‘global’ scale affecting many countries fatalistically labeled as ‘third world’, Black’s documentary examines the IMF (International Monetary Fund), a US/UK founded post-colonial structure that enables slavery to continue in disguise by establishing an international monopoly of systems of currency and trade.  While a few people in the world enjoy tourism, and other spoils such as cheap imported goods, others, like the Jamaicans, are going further and further into debt and cannot even feed themselves because of internationally controlled industry.  “You want to know who’s benefiting” from the IMF system, ask yourself, “who set it up?”  Jamaica may well be “a worse off place than it was when governed by the bad minded English” because the bad minded English when they left in 1962 paved the way for even more devastating systems of enslavement.

Black explores the crippling IMF driven debt that Jamaicans face everyday, drawing from their personal experiences and understanding of the situation whilst continually panning larger horizons, keeping attention on the international power relations fueling the IMF, revealing it for what it is.  The stirring voice of Jamaica Kinsaid, reading from her essay A Small Place is woven throughout.  Local collaboration and support of the documentary have injected it with power and energy, evident in the many voices that build such a compelling picture and a soundtrack that in itself make this well worth seeing.

The documentary remains pertinent as the processes described are happening today and look set to continue with the IMF recently being granted more financial resources at the 2009 G-20 summit.

” The IMF has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the G20 summit.

The resources it has to help troubled economies will be increased to $500bn.”

~BBC, 2009

Find out more by exploring the links below

An afterthought:

“Consumers are like those tourists who journey by coach to the Far North to retrace the steps of the gold rush, and who hire prospecting equipment and Eskimo costumes to lend a touch of local colour: they consume in ritual form what was once a historical event, necessarily re-enacted as legend.  Historically, this process is called restoration:it is the denial of history and the fixist resurrection of earlier models” ~ Jean Baudrillard, Revenge of the Crystal

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Uncategorized

The Melbourne Underground Film Festival 2009

Some things go underground for a reason


In the wake of the Melbourne International Film Festival, an event marketed as the “Melbourne Underground Film Festival” (MUFF) drew a handful of unassuming people and habitués into screenings at various bars around town. Under the pretence of championing “New Australian Cinema” – an excellent and commendable cause – this festival unfortunately fell well short of its proclaimed mission.

The official program features a computer-generated graphic consisting of two crossed medieval swords on its front page. First impressions are of poor graphic design but it is laid on so thick that the Atari-like militaristic imagery immediately smacks of internet gaming, and one wonders if the publication is in fact marketing a festival of films. The swords on the cover are accompanied by the slogan “MUFF ATTACKS”, as though the ‘festival’ itself were an actual character about to enter into 2D combat.

Flicking over the page we find festival director and self-styled combatant, Richard Wolstencroft, brandishing a Kalashnikov assault rifle.  Accompanying this image (see below), the initial ‘Dungeons and Dragons’ aesthetic morphs into something that actually begins to disturb as we read the ‘director’s statement’. Wolstoncroft does anything but confront or critique the ‘Illuminati’ of Australian cinema and conservatism of film audiences.

richard

Richard takes a shot at imaginary viper.

Wolstoncroft’s image and his ‘directors statement’ provide a large clue in the puzzle of what went wrong with MUFF.  It appears individual ambitions hijacked the great idea of an alternative, low budget underground film festival. Wolstencroft boasts of adventures “up river in Northern Uganda…”, scorns Melbourne International Film Festival organisers (a “bunch of pussies”), and finally apologises for this year’s MUFF being a “slightly reduced and rushed affair” due to his own “commitments”. The inclusion of a special Leni Riefenstahl focus is understandable for her groundbreaking work – but when coupled with the director’s penchant for machine guns and misplaced Heidegger quotations (the German philosopher controversially associated with Nazism) one wonders exactly what Wolstencroft’s game really is.  Not a great introduction to a festival and nor to him.  The website follows suit with another image of Wolstencroft looking disaffected in front of a collection of guns.  What are we supposed to make of these images and choice of personal presentation?  Surely, at the very least, this is someone who has not taken the task of representing an industry he claims to be supporting seriously.  One would assume that someone versed in cinematic effect would employ symbolic imagery of weapons less flippantly. Aside from its program, Wolstoncroft’s mere representation of MUFF undermines the very issues he is supposedly campaigning for.

Many of the screenings were over-represented by overweight, 30-something males in leather jackets who all seemed to know each other. At one of the sessions, a dozen or so randomly themed short films of varying length were consecutively screened without pauses or inter-mission, for over an hour, whilst the menfolk progressed in stages of intoxication. The thematic and stylistic randomness and sheer volume of these shorts made it very difficult to give any of the comparatively better films the attention they deserved. Inability to maintain interest was shared by the Gameboy set, who nevertheless found energy to pause their very audible conversations and cheer any scenes of violence (blood-splattering eliciting the most enthusiastic responses).

The idea to address problems existing in the Australian Film industry is commendable and it is a shame that an event bearing the name “Melbourne Underground Film Festival” does so little in this direction. Wolstoncroft blames film audiences and the establishment whilst intentionally creating an insular event, evident at the screenings, and in the aggressive, off-colour image presented in its promotion. Let us all cast down our swords (and joysticks) and hope for a more level-headed direction of MUFF in years to come.

Leave a comment

Filed under Festivals

My experience of the 2009 Melbourne International Film Festival

A well-established, well-funded annual Melbourne cultural event draws together a mixture of social elites and others under the banner of film viewing.  Aside from a varied and well-considered program of local and international films, the festival is a chance to enjoy some of Melbourne’s loveliest cinema venues and mix with some disgustingly well-dressed, well-fed people.  If you are not one of them it’s not a problem, as you can pretend you are under the cover of cinema darkness.

There is the opportunity to see one or a few films or you can “do the festival” which means seeing pretty much everything.  The people who go for this option can be seen wandering bleary eyed from film to film, poring over their schedule and skipping meals.  Skipping meals would be inevitable for some if they went to every film, so it could work out well.  It certainly was inspirational to see some people sacrificing personal hygiene in the name of cinema enthuse; not doing their laundry for an entire month on account of their viewing schedules.  If you are not one of these zealots, carefully choosing one or a few films then waiting for the rest to come out on general release is the way to go.  I saw a handful of films this year, chosen from the official program.  I recommend chasing up some other sources for reviews to get a more considered choice of viewing.

Going to the festival got me thinking about the significance of high profile cultural events like this in their potential for effecting change.  Some political issues were propelled into the media spotlight this year with the plight of the Uighur minority brought to attention in Jeff Daniels’ documentary The 10 Conditions Of Love and the heated discussion arising as a result of the ‘Balibo Five’ story being readdressed in Robert Connolly’s feature Balibo.

However you choose to participate in the festival it’s an undeniably valuable experience.  The films on offer vary richly in form and content.  There is the chance for introduction to or revisiting of the classics combined with the presentation of new work from emerging filmmakers, some daring and obscure films you may never hear of elsewhere and a varied ‘international panorama’.

I have recommended some films that stood out for me below with links to reviews on exterior sites.

Louise Bourgeois: The Spider, The Mistress and The Tangerine     co-directed by Marion Cajori and Amei Wallach

http://www.zeitgeistfilms.com/film.php?directoryname=louisebourgeois

Pierrot Le Fou

Jean-Luc Goddard

http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/directors/03/godard.html

My Asian Heart

Directed by David Bradbury

http://www.frontlinefilms.com.au/videos/asianheart.htm

The 10 Conditions of Love

Directed by Jeff Daniels

http://www.altfg.com/blog/censorship/the-10-conditions-of-love-melbourne-festival/

Leave a comment

Filed under Festivals

Welcome

Welcome aboard.  The wanderings of a fragrant vagrant have begun

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

About this blog

My foray into blogging

A hesitant blogger, I was reluctant to contribute to the online labyrinth of trash that I am seldom brave enough to venture amongst.  I will try to document some personal cultural experiences on a small, local scale.

If I have any hope for this thing I am creating, it is that it will champion the appreciation of culture in society on an everyday, personal level.  It will invite others to reflect on their own experiences as the interested, critical observers that we can all be.

At present I am working on my first post and trying to insert a background into my blog.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized